<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YoutubeIslam is now tubeislam, Google doesn&#8217;t want to &#8220;steal&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html</link>
	<description>Saudi Arabia perspective view of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top Arabic Web Apps for &#8216;09 &#171; Khaled rambles</title>
		<link>http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Arabic Web Apps for &#8216;09 &#171; Khaled rambles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauditechview.com/en/?p=433#comment-596</guid>
		<description>[...] TV OnDemand network. A good example that proves you don&#8217;t need to add YOUTUBE/TUBE in your site&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TV OnDemand network. A good example that proves you don&#8217;t need to add YOUTUBE/TUBE in your site&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziad</title>
		<link>http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauditechview.com/en/?p=433#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Negative, Google built their case based on &quot;BAD FAITH&quot; usage. What&#039;s the &quot;bad faith&quot; in here?

There are so many video sharing website that are more identical to the YouTube in name and structure, and mostly focused on Porn. Why didn&#039;t Google claim any right against them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative, Google built their case based on &#8220;BAD FAITH&#8221; usage. What&#8217;s the &#8220;bad faith&#8221; in here?</p>
<p>There are so many video sharing website that are more identical to the YouTube in name and structure, and mostly focused on Porn. Why didn&#8217;t Google claim any right against them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guroo13</title>
		<link>http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>guroo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauditechview.com/en/?p=433#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Infact I am agreed after reading:
http://blog.icann.org/2009/08/the-issue-of-youtubeislamcom-and-domain-disputes/

I would rather keep this issue objective rather subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infact I am agreed after reading:<br />
<a href="http://blog.icann.org/2009/08/the-issue-of-youtubeislamcom-and-domain-disputes/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.icann.org/2009/08/the-issue-of-youtubeislamcom-and-domain-disputes/</a></p>
<p>I would rather keep this issue objective rather subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guroo13</title>
		<link>http://www.sauditechview.com/en/youtubeislam-is-now-tubeislam.html#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>guroo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauditechview.com/en/?p=433#comment-116</guid>
		<description>agreed!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
